Sectors & Categories

1. Governance Framework and Board Oversight (25%)

• Strength, independence, and accountability of governance structures, including board committees, trustee roles, and internal oversight.
• Evidence of ethical leadership, board-level engagement, and transparency in reporting and decision-making.

2. Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) (20%)

• Implementation of a comprehensive ERM strategy addressing investment, operational, liquidity, compliance, ESG, and reputational risks.
• Use of risk registers, key risk indicators (KRIs), risk appetite frameworks, and stress testing in decision-making.

3. Regulatory Compliance and Fiduciary Responsibility (20%)

• Adherence to local and international pension, investment, and data protection regulations (e.g., SEC, PRA, FCA, PENCOM, ERISA, GDPR).
• Ongoing compliance monitoring, audit trails, reporting obligations, and engagement with supervisory authorities.

4. GRC Technology and Integration (15%)

• Deployment of systems or platforms that enhance risk monitoring, compliance automation, governance reporting, or internal controls.
• Integration of GRC tools across investment operations, member services, and third-party oversight.

5. Culture, Conduct, and Stakeholder Confidence (10%)

• Programmes promoting ethical conduct, risk awareness, and compliance culture among staff, leadership, and trustees.
• Engagement with pension members and stakeholders to build trust, ensure accountability, and protect long-term value.

6. Measurable Impact and Performance (10%)

• Demonstrated improvements in audit outcomes, risk mitigation, regulatory reviews, or member satisfaction.
• Tangible benefits resulting from GRC integration, such as operational efficiency, fund security, or enhanced reporting accuracy.

Supporting Materials (Optional but Encouraged):

• Governance structure charts, GRC frameworks, risk management reports, internal/external audit results, or compliance dashboards (anonymised where needed).
• Evidence of strategic reforms, board meeting minutes, policy updates, or investment oversight improvements.
• Regulator feedback, independent assessments, stakeholder testimonials, or performance reviews.
• Relevant certifications (e.g., ISO 37301, ISO 31000, governance accreditations).

Impact and Results:

• Judges will evaluate the tangible outcomes and positive impact of the ESG initiative.
• This could include reductions in carbon emissions, improvements in social inclusion, or enhancements in governance practices.

Innovation:

• Judges will assess the originality and creativity of the initiative.
• They will look for evidence of unique approaches, pioneering technologies, or novel strategies employed to address ESG challenges.

Integration:

• The extent to which ESG considerations have been integrated into the organization's overall business strategy will be evaluated.
• This includes alignment with core business objectives and incorporation into decision-making processes.

Stakeholder Engagement:

• Judges will consider the level of engagement with stakeholders, including employees, investors, customers, and local communities.
• Strong communication and collaboration with these groups to advance ESG goals will be a key criterion.

Scalability and Replicability:

• The scalability and replicability of the initiative will be assessed.
• Judges will look for evidence that the initiative can be expanded across the organization or adapted by others in the industry to drive broader ESG impact.

Transparency and Reporting:

• The quality and transparency of reporting on ESG performance will be considered.
• Judges will evaluate the organization's ability to provide clear, accurate, and comprehensive disclosures on its ESG practices and outcomes.

1. Demonstrated Impact (25%)

• Evidence of measurable improvements in compliance, risk mitigation, financial crime prevention, or audit outcomes.
• Quantifiable reductions in fraud incidents, regulatory breaches, or operational losses.

2. Innovation and Strategic Approach (20%)

• Implementation of cutting-edge technologies, processes, or partnerships (e.g., AI for fraud detection, digital identity systems, blockchain for compliance tracking).
• Strategic alignment between GRC practices and broader organisational or regulatory goals.

3. Governance and Risk Culture (15%)

• Demonstrated leadership in fostering an ethical and risk-aware culture across all organisational levels.
• Integration of governance and risk management into daily operations and decision-making processes.

4. Cross-Functional and Regulatory Collaboration (15%)

• Engagement with stakeholders including regulators, industry bodies, law enforcement, and global partners to improve compliance and financial crime prevention.
• Active participation in aviation GRC task forces, regulatory working groups, or anti-money laundering (AML) networks.

5. Sustainability and Resilience (15%)

• Long-term integration of GRC frameworks that support sustainable growth, safety, and operational resilience.
• Examples of successful recovery from risk events (e.g., cyberattack, fraud case, regulatory audit) due to effective governance systems.

6. Leadership, Advocacy & Influence (10%)

• Individual or organisational influence in shaping GRC and financial crime prevention best practices across the aviation sector.
• Evidence of thought leadership, industry training, or advocacy on ethical compliance and fraud deterrence.

Supporting Materials (Optional but Encouraged):

• Case studies, audit reports, risk dashboards, training material, or testimonials.
• Metrics showcasing before-and-after scenarios or comparative performance benchmarks.
• Media coverage, press releases, or industry recognition.

1. Governance and Compliance Excellence (20%)

• Strong evidence of implementing or enhancing corporate governance and regulatory compliance frameworks.
• Proactive responses to local and international transportation regulations, safety standards, and ethical requirements.
• Examples of internal control improvements and compliance audit success.

2. Financial Crime Prevention Strategy (20%)

• Demonstrated initiatives to identify, manage, and reduce exposure to financial crimes such as fraud, money laundering, procurement corruption, or asset misappropriation.
• Deployment of monitoring systems, data analytics, or red flag indicators for early detection and prevention.
• Collaboration with law enforcement, financial institutions, or regulatory bodies in investigations or enforcement actions.

3. Risk Management Impact (20%)

• Development or refinement of enterprise or operational risk management frameworks addressing transport-specific threats (e.g., cargo fraud, cyberattacks, geopolitical disruptions, climate risks).
• Risk mapping, mitigation strategies, and real-world examples of crisis avoidance or recovery due to effective planning.

4. Innovation and Technology Use (15%)

• Use of advanced technologies (e.g., AI, machine learning, blockchain, digital identity tools, GPS tracking, or automated audit systems) to improve compliance, reduce fraud risk, or monitor transport operations.
• Digital transformation aligned with GRC and financial crime prevention objectives.

5. Organisational Culture and Ethics (15%)

• Initiatives that embed GRC and ethical values into organisational culture, staff training, and leadership accountability.
• Evidence of whistleblower protection frameworks, anti-corruption campaigns, or behavioural change efforts.

6. Industry Influence and Collaboration (10%)

• Contribution to industry-wide standards, working groups, or partnerships that promote good governance, regulatory resilience, or financial integrity in the transportation sector.
• Influence on peers or policymakers through advocacy, education, or knowledge-sharing platforms.

Supporting Documentation (Optional but Encouraged):

• Internal audit reports, GRC dashboards, fraud detection tools, training materials, case studies, or risk registers.
• Impact metrics or testimonials from regulators, partners, or stakeholders.
• Media coverage or industry recognitions.

1. Demonstrated Impact (25%)

• Evidence of meaningful contributions to a GRC, compliance, or financial crime prevention initiative, project, or function.
• Positive change brought about by the nominee’s work (e.g., improved compliance, risk reduction, increased awareness, or technology adoption).

2. Initiative and Innovation (20%)

• Willingness to go beyond the scope of assigned duties by proactively identifying problems, proposing solutions, or introducing fresh ideas.
• Examples of creativity or new approaches in tackling GRC challenges, including digital solutions, ESG integration, or data-driven insights.

3. Learning and Development (15%)

• Commitment to continuous learning through certifications, training, research, or professional development in GRC or financial crime prevention.
• Involvement in industry events, thought leadership, mentoring, or contributions to professional communities.

4. Leadership Potential (15%)

• Demonstration of early leadership qualities such as influencing others, collaborating across teams, or leading initiatives.
• Recognition by peers or supervisors for attitude, integrity, and potential for future leadership.

5. Values and Ethics (15%)

• Strong adherence to ethical standards and organisational values.
• Advocating for transparency, accountability, anti-corruption, or ethical conduct in day-to-day operations.

6. Industry Engagement and Visibility (10%)

• Active participation in professional networks, industry forums, student societies, or awareness campaigns related to GRC and financial crime prevention.
• Recognition or awards from employers, professional bodies, or industry groups.

Supporting Documentation (Optional but Encouraged):

• Testimonials from managers, mentors, or stakeholders.
• Samples of work or project summaries.
• Professional development records or certifications (e.g., AGRC, ICA, ACAMS, ACFCS, CFE, ISO certifications).
• Press coverage, event participation, or internal recognition awards.

1. Measurable Impact (25%)

• Demonstrable results from the team’s work in improving risk oversight, regulatory compliance, fraud detection/prevention, or operational resilience.
• Examples of financial savings, risk reduction, audit improvements, regulatory engagement success, or enhanced stakeholder confidence.

2. Collaboration and Teamwork (20%)

• Evidence of strong internal collaboration, communication, and synergy across team members and departments.
• Examples of how the team overcame silos, adapted to challenges, and worked cohesively to achieve shared goals.

3. Innovation in Practice (15%)

• Use of innovative tools, technologies, or methodologies to drive efficiencies or enhance GRC and financial crime prevention processes.
• Forward-thinking approaches to issues such as ESG risks, digital compliance, third-party risk, or AI-driven monitoring.

4. Leadership and Culture (15%)

• Role of the team in promoting a culture of ethics, compliance, and accountability throughout the organisation.
• Leadership in setting standards, mentoring others, and modelling best practices in governance and risk behaviours.

5. Agility and Responsiveness (15%)

• The team’s ability to respond to crises, changing regulations, emerging threats, or operational disruptions (e.g., post-incident response, regulatory audits, internal investigations, etc.).
• Examples of timely interventions or recovery actions led by the team.

6. Stakeholder and Industry Engagement (10%)

• Evidence of the team’s role in cross-functional, cross-sector, or regulatory collaborations that influence or improve industry GRC and financial crime practices.
• Engagement in policy consultations, knowledge-sharing forums, or public-private partnerships.

Supporting Materials (Optional but Encouraged):

• Case studies, team bios, project dashboards, visuals, and outcome reports.
• Testimonials from leadership, stakeholders, or regulatory bodies.
• Internal or external recognitions, audit outcomes, or independent validations of impact.

1. Thought Leadership and Expertise (25%)

• Demonstrated subject-matter expertise in governance, risk, compliance, or financial crime prevention.
• Influential publications, articles, webinars, interviews, or policy contributions that advance knowledge in the field.

2. Influence and Reach (20%)

• Significant audience reach across digital platforms, media outlets, professional forums, or events.
• Track record of building engaged communities and catalysing discussions around key GRC and financial crime topics.

3. Impact on Policy or Practice (20%)

• Tangible examples of influence on policies, standards, organisational practices, or industry direction.
• Involvement in advisory boards, government consultations, regulatory reform, or cross-industry collaboration.

4. Advocacy and Ethical Leadership (15%)

• Strong advocacy for transparency, anti-corruption, inclusion, and ethical conduct in financial systems and corporate governance.
• Championing of underrepresented voices or pressing issues (e.g., ESG risk, AI ethics, AML gaps, data protection).

5. Engagement and Education (10%)

• Contribution to professional development, capacity building, or public awareness (e.g., training programs, workshops, mentoring, campaigns).
• Collaboration with professional bodies, academic institutions, or civil society to amplify impact.

6. Authenticity and Integrity (10%)

• Recognition for consistent, values-driven communication and influence.
• Upholding of professional ethics, factual accuracy, and a constructive tone in advocacy efforts.

Supporting Materials (Optional but Encouraged):

• Links to media features, publications, blogs, interviews, or event recordings.
• Social media metrics (e.g., following, engagement), campaign summaries, or community feedback.
• Testimonials from industry peers, partners, or beneficiaries.
• Proof of involvement in working groups, advisory roles, or institutional change initiatives.

1. Audit Excellence and Execution (25%)

• Delivery of high-quality audit plans, reports, and assurance reviews that demonstrate depth, clarity, and value-added insights.
• Examples of risk-based audits, root-cause analysis, or real-time assurance activities that improved organisational GRC posture.

2. Financial Crime Risk Identification & Mitigation (20%)

• Success in identifying control weaknesses, fraud vulnerabilities, AML/CFT deficiencies, or non-compliance that could lead to financial crime or reputational damage.
• Tangible improvements made following audit recommendations or interventions.

3. Innovation in Audit Practice (15%)

• Adoption of innovative audit methodologies, data analytics, continuous monitoring tools, or AI to enhance audit accuracy and coverage.
• Implementation of technology-enabled or agile audit processes aligned with GRC trends.

4. Cross-Functional Collaboration (15%)

• Effective collaboration with risk, compliance, finance, operations, or external regulators in achieving integrated assurance objectives.
• Contributions to enterprise risk management and internal controls improvement across departments.

5. Strategic Value and Organisational Impact (15%)

• Evidence of internal audit’s influence on executive decision-making, policy reform, or organisational strategy.
• Role in shaping governance structures, assurance maturity, or risk intelligence culture.

6. Professionalism and Ethical Conduct (10%)

• Demonstrated commitment to the International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing (IPPF), IIA Code of Ethics, or equivalent standards.
• Reputation for independence, objectivity, and professionalism in audit execution and stakeholder communication.

Supporting Materials (Optional but Encouraged):

• Audit summaries, assurance dashboards, executive briefings, or key findings (appropriately anonymised).
• Testimonials from senior leadership, audit committees, or external stakeholders.
• Metrics showing control enhancements, risk rating improvements, or fraud prevention outcomes post-audit.
• Tools or frameworks developed to support audit innovation or assurance transformation.

1. Strategic Leadership and Vision (25%)

• Evidence of leading or driving large-scale financial crime prevention initiatives or transformation programmes.
• Influence in setting strategic direction for fraud risk management, AML compliance, investigations, or financial integrity policy.
• Visionary leadership in navigating complex or high-risk environments.

2. Operational Impact and Results (20%)

• Demonstrable outcomes such as improved fraud detection rates, successful criminal investigations, financial recovery, strengthened controls, or reduced regulatory exposure.
• Case examples of operational excellence, enforcement success, or post-incident recovery led by the nominee.

3. Collaboration and Industry Influence (20%)

• Active involvement in public-private partnerships, inter-agency collaboration, cross-border initiatives, or industry taskforces.
• Contributions to global or regional AML/CTF frameworks, fraud intelligence sharing platforms, or regulatory reform.

4. Innovation and Adaptability (15%)

• Introduction or championing of advanced tools, methodologies, or digital solutions (e.g., machine learning for fraud detection, blockchain analytics, KYC automation).
• Response to emerging threats such as cyber-enabled financial crimes, crypto fraud, or pandemic-related scams.

5. Advocacy, Mentorship and Capacity Building (10%)

• Commitment to mentoring future professionals, building internal capabilities, or influencing a culture of compliance and ethical leadership.
• Public speaking, publishing, or educational efforts to promote awareness and resilience.

6. Integrity and Ethical Leadership (10%)

• Consistent demonstration of integrity, objectivity, and ethical conduct in decision-making and leadership.
• Recognition as a role model within their organisation, industry, or regulatory community.

Supporting Materials (Optional but Encouraged):

• Case summaries (appropriately anonymised), awards or citations, reports, strategic plans, and impact metrics.
• Testimonials from executive leadership, regulators, enforcement agencies, or industry peers.
• Published articles, media coverage, or speeches highlighting influence or thought leadership.

1. Strategic Leadership and Vision (25%)

• Evidence of leading or driving large-scale financial crime prevention initiatives or transformation programmes.
• Influence in setting strategic direction for fraud risk management, AML compliance, investigations, or financial integrity policy.
• Visionary leadership in navigating complex or high-risk environments.

2. Operational Impact and Results (20%)

• Demonstrable outcomes such as improved fraud detection rates, successful criminal investigations, financial recovery, strengthened controls, or reduced regulatory exposure.
• Case examples of operational excellence, enforcement success, or post-incident recovery led by the nominee.

3. Collaboration and Industry Influence (20%)

• Active involvement in public-private partnerships, inter-agency collaboration, cross-border initiatives, or industry taskforces.
• Contributions to global or regional AML/CTF frameworks, fraud intelligence sharing platforms, or regulatory reform.

4. Innovation and Adaptability (15%)

• Introduction or championing of advanced tools, methodologies, or digital solutions (e.g., machine learning for fraud detection, blockchain analytics, KYC automation).
• Response to emerging threats such as cyber-enabled financial crimes, crypto fraud, or pandemic-related scams.

5. Advocacy, Mentorship and Capacity Building (10%)

• Commitment to mentoring future professionals, building internal capabilities, or influencing a culture of compliance and ethical leadership.
• Public speaking, publishing, or educational efforts to promote awareness and resilience.

6. Integrity and Ethical Leadership (10%)

• Consistent demonstration of integrity, objectivity, and ethical conduct in decision-making and leadership.
• Recognition as a role model within their organisation, industry, or regulatory community.

Supporting Materials (Optional but Encouraged):

• Case summaries (appropriately anonymised), awards or citations, reports, strategic plans, and impact metrics.
• Testimonials from executive leadership, regulators, enforcement agencies, or industry peers.
• Published articles, media coverage, or speeches highlighting influence or thought leadership.

1. Cybersecurity Strategy and Risk Management (25%)

• Development and implementation of a robust cybersecurity strategy aligned with enterprise risk and GRC frameworks.
• Demonstrated ability to identify, assess, and mitigate cyber threats, vulnerabilities, and incidents across systems and data assets.

2. Data Governance and Compliance Excellence (20%)

• Establishment or enhancement of data governance programs that ensure integrity, availability, and confidentiality of information.
• Effective alignment with global or regional data protection regulations (e.g., GDPR, CCPA, ISO 27001, etc.).

3. Threat Detection, Response and Recovery (15%)

• Strong operational performance in cyber threat intelligence, incident detection, response readiness, and business continuity planning.
• Examples of successful defence against ransomware, phishing, insider threats, or data breaches.

4. Innovation and Digital Resilience (15%)

• Use of cutting-edge technologies such as artificial intelligence, zero trust architecture, data loss prevention tools, or blockchain for enhanced cyber and data governance.
• Implementation of proactive monitoring, predictive analytics, or automated governance controls.

5. Culture, Awareness & Training (15%)

• Initiatives that promote cyber hygiene, data ethics, and compliance awareness across the organisation.
• Leadership in conducting enterprise-wide security awareness training, phishing simulations, or ethical data handling programs.

6. Collaboration and Stakeholder Engagement (10%)

• Engagement with regulators, industry peers, law enforcement, or sector-specific cyber alliances to drive shared defence and risk intelligence.
• Contributions to policy development, public-private threat information sharing, or national security objectives.

Supporting Materials (Optional but Encouraged):

• Cybersecurity or data governance frameworks, program overviews, risk dashboards, or audit reports (anonymised).
• Incident response case studies, awareness campaign materials, or maturity assessments.
• Testimonials from internal stakeholders, regulators, clients, or partners.
• Metrics demonstrating reduced incidents, improved compliance scores, or enhanced data resilience.

1. Governance and Regulatory Compliance (25%)

• Evidence of strong corporate governance frameworks aligned with utility sector standards and relevant regulations (e.g., Ofgem, EPA, NERC, ISO standards).
• Successful handling of audits, inspections, or compliance reviews and policy implementation that ensure ongoing regulatory alignment.

2. Risk Management and Resilience (20%)

• Proactive identification, management, and mitigation of enterprise, operational, ESG, and cyber-related risks.
• Implementation of risk registers, scenario planning, or resilience programs that protect critical infrastructure and service delivery.

3. Financial Crime Prevention and Controls (20%)

• Effective measures to prevent, detect, and respond to financial crime, procurement fraud, bribery, and misuse of public or corporate resources.
• Collaboration with auditors, regulators, or law enforcement on fraud cases, whistleblower protection, or forensic investigations.

4. Innovation in GRC and Security (15%)

• Use of technology, data analytics, or digital governance platforms to improve compliance oversight, fraud detection, or real-time risk monitoring.
• Development of digital assurance tools, automated controls, or ESG-linked compliance systems.

5. Culture of Integrity and Accountability (10%)

• Demonstrated commitment to ethics, transparency, and accountability across teams and leadership.
• Internal communication, training, or cultural change programs that strengthen ethical conduct and employee empowerment.

6. Sustainability, ESG and Stakeholder Trust (10%)

• Integration of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risk frameworks within compliance and operational processes.
• Engagement with communities, regulators, and stakeholders to promote responsible governance and trust.

Supporting Materials (Optional but Encouraged):

• Governance frameworks, risk reports, compliance dashboards, fraud case summaries (anonymised), or project documentation.
• Audit results, regulatory responses, internal/external testimonials, or sustainability reports.
• Metrics showing reduced regulatory breaches, fraud cases, or improved governance maturity.
• Case studies of infrastructure protection, ethical procurement, or digital GRC transformation.

1. Governance and Transparency (25%)

• Implementation or enhancement of policies, frameworks, or oversight mechanisms to improve accountability, transparency, and ethical governance.
• Demonstrable efforts to reduce bureaucracy, enhance audit readiness, and increase public trust in decision-making processes.

2. Financial Crime Prevention and Control (20%)

• Measures taken to detect, investigate, or prevent fraud, corruption, bribery, procurement abuse, or misuse of public funds.
• Use of whistleblower frameworks, forensic audits, fraud detection tools, or collaboration with enforcement agencies.

3. Risk Management and Resilience (15%)

• Proactive identification and mitigation of institutional, operational, policy, or cyber risks.
• Integration of enterprise risk management or crisis response frameworks tailored to public sector challenges.

4. Compliance and Regulatory Excellence (15%)

• Alignment with national laws, international standards (e.g., FATF, UNCAC, ISO), and public accountability mandates.
• Successful audit outcomes, regulatory reviews, or compliance performance improvements.

5. Innovation in Service Delivery and Oversight (15%)

• Implementation of digital tools, data analytics, automation, or AI to support governance, oversight, and fraud detection in public sector operations.
• Use of innovation to enhance service quality, transparency, or regulatory reporting.

6. Public Impact, Engagement and Culture (10%)

• Engagement with stakeholders, civil society, or beneficiaries to improve transparency and foster a culture of accountability.
• Internal ethics campaigns, training programs, or values-driven leadership that empowers staff and promotes good governance.

Supporting Materials (Optional)

• Governance frameworks, audit reports, performance dashboards, internal policies, or program summaries (anonymised).
• Case studies, investigation outcomes, or fraud prevention campaigns.
• Testimonials from oversight bodies, beneficiaries, or civil society organisations.
• Public recognition, media features, or legislative acknowledgments.

Leadership:

• The nominee should demonstrate outstanding leadership in the field of financial crime prevention, anti-money laundering (AML), and fraud detection.
• This includes spearheading initiatives, developing strategies, and leading teams to effectively address financial crime and fraud risks.

Innovation:

• The nominee should have introduced innovative approaches, technologies, or methodologies to enhance financial crime prevention and fraud detection efforts.
• This could involve implementing advanced analytics, artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning, or other cutting-edge solutions to identify and mitigate emerging threats.

Expertise:

• The nominee should possess a high level of expertise and proficiency in financial crime prevention, AML compliance, and fraud detection practices.
• This includes a deep understanding of relevant laws, regulations, and industry standards, as well as the ability to apply this knowledge to develop robust compliance programs and detection systems.

Impact:

• The nominee should have made a significant impact on their organization, industry, or community through their contributions to financial crime prevention and fraud detection.
• This could be evidenced by the reduction of financial losses, the disruption of criminal activities, or the enhancement of regulatory compliance measures.

Collaboration:

• The nominee should demonstrate an ability to collaborate effectively with internal and external stakeholders, including law enforcement agencies, regulatory bodies, and industry partners.
• This includes fostering partnerships, sharing information and best practices, and working together to address common challenges and threats.

Advocacy:

• The nominee should be actively engaged in advocating for the importance of financial crime prevention, AML compliance, and fraud detection efforts.
• This could involve raising awareness, promoting education and training, or advocating for policy reforms to strengthen anti-financial crime measures.

Integrity and Ethics:

• The nominee should uphold the highest standards of integrity, ethics, and professionalism in their work to combat financial crime and fraud.
• This includes demonstrating honesty, transparency, and accountability in their actions, as well as adhering to legal and regulatory requirements.

Note: Nominations for the Financial Crime Prevention / Anti-Financial Crime & Fraud Woman of the Year Awards are open to women working in various sectors, including banking, finance, law enforcement, regulatory agencies, consulting, and technology. Self-nominations and nominations from peers, colleagues, or industry partners are welcome.

Leadership:

• The nominee should exhibit exemplary leadership qualities in driving GRC initiatives within their organization or community.
• This includes demonstrating vision, strategic thinking, and the ability to inspire others towards achieving GRC objectives.

Innovation:

• The nominee should have introduced innovative approaches, strategies, or solutions to address GRC challenges effectively.
• This could involve implementing new technologies, processes, or methodologies to enhance governance, risk management, or compliance practices.

Expertise:

• The nominee should possess a high level of expertise and proficiency in GRC principles, regulations, and best practices.
• This includes a demonstrated understanding of relevant laws, regulations, and industry standards, as well as the ability to apply this knowledge effectively in practical settings.

Impact:

• The nominee should have made a tangible and measurable impact on their organization, industry, or community through their contributions to GRC.
• This could be evidenced by improvements in governance structures, risk mitigation strategies, compliance programs, or overall organizational performance.

Advocacy:

• The nominee should be actively engaged in advocating for the importance of GRC and promoting awareness of its significance within their organization, industry, or community.
• This could involve participating in thought leadership activities, speaking engagements, or mentoring others in the GRC profession.

Diversity and Inclusion:

• The nominee should demonstrate a commitment to promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion within the GRC profession.
• This includes fostering a culture of inclusivity, supporting the advancement of women and underrepresented groups in GRC roles, and championing diversity initiatives within their organization or community.

Professionalism and Integrity:

• The nominee should adhere to the highest standards of professionalism, ethics, and integrity in their GRC practice.
• This includes demonstrating honesty, transparency, and accountability in their actions, as well as upholding the principles of fairness and justice in all aspects of their work.

Note: Nominations for the GRC Woman of the Year Awards are open to women working in various sectors, including corporate, government, non-profit, and academia. Self-nominations and nominations from peers, colleagues, or industry partners are welcome.

Investigative Reporting:

• The nominee should showcase excellence in investigative reporting, uncovering significant issues, exposing wrongdoing, and shedding light on critical aspects of GRC and financial crime prevention.
• This could include in-depth investigations into corporate scandals, regulatory failures, fraudulent activities, or emerging risks impacting businesses and society.

Insightful Analysis:

• The nominee should provide insightful analysis and commentary on complex GRC issues, regulatory developments, and trends in financial crime and fraud prevention.
• This could involve offering expert opinions, perspectives from industry insiders, and thought-provoking insights that help audiences understand the implications and significance of key developments in these areas.

Informative Coverage:

• The nominee should deliver informative and engaging coverage of GRC-related topics, anti-financial crime initiatives, and fraud prevention strategies through various media channels, including print, broadcast, digital, and social media platforms.
• This could include news articles, feature stories, documentaries, podcasts, webinars, and interactive multimedia content.

Accuracy and Objectivity:

• The nominee should uphold the highest standards of accuracy, fairness, and objectivity in their reporting, ensuring that information presented is factually correct, balanced, and free from bias or undue influence.
• This includes conducting thorough research, verifying sources, and presenting multiple perspectives on complex issues.

Impact and Influence:

• The nominee should demonstrate the impact and influence of their reporting or media coverage on raising awareness, shaping public discourse, and driving positive change in GRC and financial crime prevention.
• This could be evidenced by tangible outcomes such as policy reforms, regulatory actions, corporate accountability, or public engagement and advocacy efforts.

Audience Engagement:

• The nominee should actively engage and interact with their audience, fostering dialogue, soliciting feedback, and encouraging participation in discussions related to GRC and financial crime prevention.
• This could involve responding to audience inquiries, hosting public forums or town hall meetings, and leveraging social media platforms to facilitate engagement and conversation.

Reputation and Recognition:

• The nominee should have a strong reputation and be recognized as a trusted source of news and information in the GRC and financial crime prevention space.
• This could be evidenced by industry awards, accolades, audience ratings, and endorsements from peers, industry experts, and stakeholders who value the quality and credibility of their reporting or media coverage.

1. Training Quality and Curriculum Relevance (25%)

• High-quality, well-structured, and up-to-date curriculum aligned with global standards (e.g., FATF, ISO, Basel, GDPR, OFAC, FCA, SEC).
• Coverage of key topics in GRC, AML/CTF, fraud risk, internal audit, regulatory compliance, ESG governance, cybersecurity, etc.

2. Impact and Outcomes (25%)

• Measurable outcomes such as learner certification rates, improvements in organisational compliance, exam pass rates, or positive behavioural change.
• Client feedback, success stories, or testimonials validating training effectiveness.

3. Innovation in Delivery (20%)

• Use of innovative methods such as e-learning platforms, gamified learning, simulations, scenario-based training, blended learning, or mobile learning apps.
• Accessibility, interactivity, and adaptability of training formats for diverse learners or regions.

4. Industry Reach and Sector Engagement (15%)

• Breadth of organisations trained (e.g., banks, government agencies, fintechs, law enforcement, corporates).
• Contributions to workforce development, certification standards, or public-private capacity-building initiatives.

5. Trainer Expertise and Thought Leadership (10%)

• Credentials, experience, and industry influence of trainers, facilitators, or curriculum developers.
• Involvement in regulatory forums, publications, or global knowledge-sharing platforms.

6. Commitment to Ethics, Inclusion & Continuous Learning (5%)

• Inclusion of ethics, transparency, DEI, and professional integrity themes in training delivery.
• Support for ongoing learner development through refresher courses, mentoring, alumni engagement, or career support.

Supporting Materials (Optional):

• Course brochures, syllabi, learning outcomes, demo access, or sample content.
• Client list (anonymised if needed), learner testimonials, post-training surveys, or evaluation reports.
• Awards, accreditations, endorsements, or regulatory recognition (e.g., CPD, ISO 29993, or approval by professional bodies).

1. Client Impact and Value Delivery (30%)

• Demonstrated positive outcomes and measurable benefits delivered to clients (e.g., improved compliance posture, regulatory approval, risk reduction, cost efficiency).
• Case studies, client testimonials, or before-and-after performance indicators.

2. Service Innovation and Adaptability (20%)

• Use of innovative approaches, technology, or methodologies to solve complex compliance and risk challenges.
• Flexibility and responsiveness in adapting services to client needs, industry trends, or regulatory changes.

3. Breadth and Depth of Expertise (15%)

• Proven knowledge and technical capability in relevant GRC and financial crime domains (e.g., AML, sanctions, ESG, audit, internal controls, RegTech).
• Industry credentials, certifications, and experience across regions or regulatory regimes.

4. Quality Assurance and Governance (15%)

• Strong internal quality controls, audit mechanisms, and governance standards guiding service delivery.
• Ethical conduct, independence, and transparency in client engagements.

5. Thought Leadership and Market Influence (10%)

• Contributions to industry knowledge through publications, speaking engagements, advisory boards, or regulatory consultations.
• Influence on shaping GRC or financial crime prevention practices within the market.

6. Client Relationship and Trust (10%)

• Long-term partnerships and client retention supported by service excellence, responsiveness, and reliability.
• Evidence of working as a strategic advisor rather than just a vendor.

Supporting Materials (Optional):

• Case studies, service performance dashboards, client testimonials, project summaries (anonymised if necessary).
• Certifications (e.g., ISO 27001, ISO 37301), awards, or regulatory endorsements.
• Sample deliverables (e.g., risk reports, AML frameworks, remediation plans) or methodologies (proprietary tools, managed service platforms).
• Feedback from client satisfaction surveys or renewal data.

1. Placement Success and Client Impact (30%)

• Evidence of successful placements across compliance, risk, audit, AML/CTF, regulatory, governance, or forensic functions.
• Demonstrated client satisfaction, retention, and the long-term value of talent placed.

2. Market Knowledge and Specialisation (20%)

• Depth of understanding and proven expertise in the GRC and financial crime prevention sector.
• Ability to advise clients on talent trends, skills gaps, regulatory needs, and emerging role profiles.

3. Candidate Quality and Experience (15%)

• Evidence that placed candidates have added strategic value, enhanced regulatory readiness, or improved risk and compliance performance.
• Support provided to candidates (e.g., onboarding, coaching, career development).

4. Innovation and Digital Talent Solutions (15%)

• Use of digital platforms, AI-driven sourcing, talent analytics, or proprietary databases to enhance recruitment effectiveness.
• Creative talent engagement and pipeline strategies that go beyond traditional search.

5. Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI) Practices (10%)

• Initiatives to promote diverse hiring and inclusive representation in GRC and anti-fincrime roles.
• Evidence of advising clients or advocating for DEI in risk and compliance leadership.

6. Thought Leadership and Industry Engagement (10%)

• Contributions to the broader talent conversation through whitepapers, roundtables, webinars, or professional partnerships.
• Participation in industry events or collaboration with regulators, associations, or academic institutions.

Supporting Materials (Optional):

• Client testimonials, case studies, or performance metrics (e.g., time-to-fill, retention rates, offer acceptance rates).
• Candidate success stories or career progression updates.
• Evidence of proprietary tools, DEI programs, talent benchmarking reports, or GRC-focused job market insights.
• Awards, certifications, or accreditations (e.g., REC, APSCo, ISO).

1. Innovation and Originality (25%)

• Demonstrated novelty or originality of the solution in addressing a GRC or financial crime prevention challenge.
• Distinctive features, architecture, or use of cutting-edge technologies (e.g., AI, blockchain, behavioural analytics, NLP, machine learning, APIs, cloud-native frameworks).

2. Effectiveness and Client Impact (25%)

• Tangible results delivered to clients, including improved compliance, risk reduction, automation, cost savings, or regulatory success.
• Evidence of adoption across industries or user feedback validating the solution's impact.

3. Usability and User Experience (15%)

• Intuitive design, ease of deployment, user adoption rate, and integration capabilities with other systems.
• Client-centric functionality, scalability, and performance under operational or regulatory pressures.

4. Alignment with GRC & FinCrime Priorities (15%)

• The solution’s direct relevance to key regulatory and operational pain points (e.g., AML screening, audit readiness, third-party due diligence, ESG reporting).
• Supports enterprise-wide governance, internal controls, transparency, and real-time risk visibility.

5. Market Influence and Adoption (10%)

• Market reach, client base, partnerships, or ecosystem influence in shaping future-ready GRC or financial crime prevention practices.
• Deployment success across different sectors, regions, or compliance maturity levels.

6. Thought Leadership and Future-readiness (10%)

• Ongoing contribution to the professional community through whitepapers, innovation showcases, webinars, or policy engagement.
• Vision for future enhancements, roadmap transparency, and response to emerging threats and regulatory trends.

Supporting Materials (Optional):

• Product demos, solution overviews, case studies, or deployment data.
• Client testimonials, ROI analysis, or compliance performance metrics.
• Awards, certifications (e.g., ISO 27001, SOC 2, GDPR compliance), and third-party validations.
• Industry collaborations, sandbox participation, or regulatory tech partnerships.

1. Distinguished Career Contributions (30%)

• A track record of sustained and influential contributions to GRC, compliance, or financial crime prevention across a lifetime of service.
• Pioneering initiatives, frameworks, or reforms that have had national, regional, or global significance.

2. Leadership and Legacy (25%)

• Recognised as a visionary leader or catalyst for positive change in organisations, industries, or regulatory systems.
• Mentorship of future leaders, institutional reform, or capacity-building that leaves a lasting legacy.

3. Advocacy and Ethical Commitment (15%)

• Promotion of ethics, transparency, accountability, and anti-corruption as central tenets of professional practice.
• Standing up for public interest, whistleblower protections, or systemic integrity.

4. Global or Sectoral Influence (10%)

• Contributions that influenced cross-border standards, sectoral best practices, international cooperation, or multilateral dialogue.
• Recognition by peers, governments, professional bodies, or industry leaders.

5. Thought Leadership and Knowledge Advancement (10%)

• Publications, speaking engagements, academic contributions, or policy input that has advanced the field intellectually or practically.
• Development of educational or professional standards in GRC or financial crime prevention.

6. Awards, Honours & Recognition (10%)

• Previously received awards, appointments, citations, or honorary roles that reflect the individual’s influence and reputation.

Supporting Materials (Optional):

• Career summary or biography.
• List of notable achievements, reforms, published works, or programs led.
• Testimonials from peers, institutions, regulators, mentees, or beneficiaries.
• Public recognitions, previous awards, citations, or board appointments.